Karnataka Bank Ltd.,Kirimanjeshwara Branch, Rep by its Principal Officer, Jeswanth Shetty vs Mohammed Ismail — 83/2023

Case under Karnataka Value Added Tax Act 2003 Section U/S 26, O VII, R 1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th July 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP400004562023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

18th July 2026

Filing Number

83/2023

Filing Date

12-01-2023

Registration No

83/2023

Registration Date

12-01-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,BAINDURU

Judge

1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Value Added Tax Act 2003 Section U/S 26, O VII, R 1

Petitioner(s)

Karnataka Bank Ltd.,Kirimanjeshwara Branch, Rep by its Principal Officer, Jeswanth Shetty

Adv. T. Mallikarjuna Puranik

Respondent(s)

Mohammed Ismail

Hearing History

Judge: 1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

28-11-2025

EVIDENCE

11-09-2025

EVIDENCE

24-07-2025

ISSUES

17-07-2025

ISSUES

Interim Orders

28-11-2025
Deposition

Summary: In Civil case O.S. No. 83/2023 heard on 28-11-2025, the court examined witness Sri Parmeswara and recorded his sworn testimony. The plaintiff's counsel submitted various documentary evidence including a bank authority letter, sanction order dated 13.08.2018, defendant's declaration and hypothecation agreement dated 20.08.2018, term loan consent letter, and account extract, which were all marked as exhibits (NP1-7). The defendant's counsel was granted time to file their cross-examination response, and the matter is pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil case O.S. No. 83/2023 heard on 28-11-2025, the court examined witness Sri Parmeswara and recorded his sworn testimony. The plaintiff's counsel submitted various documentary evidence including a bank authority letter, sanction order dated 13.08.2018, defendant's declaration and hypothecation agreement dated 20.08.2018, term loan consent letter, and account extract, which were all marked as exhibits (NP1-7). The defendant's counsel was granted time to file their cross-examination response, and the matter is pending further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,BAINDURU All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case