Parvathi vs M Dastagiri Saheb — 6/2023

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application (IA No.II) for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as she was merely an attesting witness to the disputed sale deed dated 24-06-2009 and lacked legal standing to seek cancellation of the document under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act. Consequently, questions of balance of convenience and irreparable loss did not require consideration, and the case is scheduled for hearing on issues on 05-06-2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.