Parvathi vs M Dastagiri Saheb — 6/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s26,OVII,R1and2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP400000132023
Filing Number
6/2023
Filing Date
05-Jan-2023
Registration No
6/2023
Registration Date
05-Jan-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,BAINDURU
Judge
1528-CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Parvathi
Adv. T. Gurumurthy Rao
Respondent(s)
-
1.M Dastagiri Saheb
Case History
-
18-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Oct-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jun-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2025
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Dec-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Sep-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jul-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jun-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Feb-2024
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Dec-2023
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Sep-2023
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jun-2023
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Mar-2023
OrdersView PDF
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application (IA No.II) for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as she was merely an attesting witness to the disputed sale deed dated 24-06-2009 and lacked legal standing to seek cancellation of the document under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act. Consequently, questions of balance of convenience and irreparable loss did not require consideration, and the case is scheduled for hearing on issues on 05-06-2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Mar-2023
Issues
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Mar-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Mar-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Mar-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Mar-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Mar-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Feb-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Feb-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Feb-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jan-2023
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jan-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
05-Jan-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 6/2023
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's application (IA No.II) for temporary injunction under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and 2 of the CPC. The court found that the plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case, as she was merely an attesting witness to the disputed sale deed dated 24-06-2009 and lacked legal standing to seek cancellation of the document under Section 31 of the Specific Relief Act. Consequently, questions of balance of convenience and irreparable loss did not require consideration, and the case is scheduled for hearing on issues on 05-06-2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts