Babu Billava vs Ravi Naik Advocate - Malyady Jayarama Shetty — 3/2023
Case under Rul 230@a R/w 177 Imv Act Section 65. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP400000072023
Next Hearing
18th June 2026
Filing Number
3/2023
Filing Date
05-01-2023
Registration No
3/2023
Registration Date
05-01-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC,BAINDURU
Judge
1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Babu Billava
Adv. NSR BHAT
Respondent(s)
Ravi Naik Advocate - Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Annappa Naik
Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Venkayya Naik
Subbayya Naik
Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Macha Naik
Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Nagamma Naikthi
Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Sandhya
Adv. Lingappa
Ananda Naik
Bhaskar Naik
Hearing History
Judge: 1528-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ISSUES
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-06-2025 | ISSUES |
| 20-03-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court partially allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in a property dispute. The defendants are restrained from forcibly blocking, closing, or obstructing access to a Panchayath road on the southern side of the plaintiff's property until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case and that balance of convenience favored him, though it clarified the order does not prevent the Gram Panchayath from performing its statutory functions. The case is scheduled for next hearing on 14-09-2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court partially allowed the plaintiff's application for temporary injunction in a property dispute. The defendants are restrained from forcibly blocking, closing, or obstructing access to a Panchayath road on the southern side of the plaintiff's property until final disposal of the suit. The court found the plaintiff established a prima facie case and that balance of convenience favored him, though it clarified the order does not prevent the Gram Panchayath from performing its statutory functions. The case is scheduled for next hearing on 14-09-2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts