K Anantha Kamath vs Gulabiyamma and 12 others — 2287/2017
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,144,447,427,506rw149. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP330034212017
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
2287/2017
Filing Date
06-12-2017
Registration No
2287/2017
Registration Date
06-12-2017
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
K Anantha Kamath
Adv. NSR BHAT
Respondent(s)
Gulabiyamma and 12 others
A2- Vadhiraja Hebbar
A3- Shambhavi
A4- Sathish Poojary
A5- Sharada Ganiga
A6- Shankarnarayana Ganiga
A7- Ananda Poojary
A8-Saroja
A9- Sadhananda Maiyya
A10- Yashodha Maiyya
A11- Ananda
A12- Narayana
A13- Jayanthi Ganiga
Hearing History
Judge: 517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The case involves a civil dispute before the 1st Additional Civil Court, Kundapura (Case No. 2287/2017, dated 22.12.2025) concerning alleged unauthorized removal of compound wall and fence from the plaintiff's property in 2016 and subsequent construction. The plaintiff alleges the accused demolished their property structure and constructed unauthorized structures, with their complaint not being accepted by authorities. The defendant's counsel raised objections to the proceedings. The court admitted witness evidence and the matter appears to be in the evidentiary stage of trial, with the order directing proceedings on the merits of the property dispute case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The case involves a civil dispute before the 1st Additional Civil Court, Kundapura (Case No. 2287/2017, dated 22.12.2025) concerning alleged unauthorized removal of compound wall and fence from the plaintiff's property in 2016 and subsequent construction. The plaintiff alleges the accused demolished their property structure and constructed unauthorized structures, with their complaint not being accepted by authorities. The defendant's counsel raised objections to the proceedings. The court admitted witness evidence and the matter appears to be in the evidentiary stage of trial, with the order directing proceedings on the merits of the property dispute case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts