The S.H.O. Kundapura P.S. vs Nagaratna Havaldar — 2409/2015

Case under Section U/s323,354(B),504,506r/w34I.P.C. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP330033742015

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

Filing Date

07-07-2015

Registration No

2409/2015

Registration Date

07-07-2015

Court

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Section U/s323,354(B),504,506r/w34I.P.C

Petitioner(s)

The S.H.O. Kundapura P.S.

Adv. The A.P.P. Kundapura

Respondent(s)

Nagaratna Havaldar

A-2 Sadanand Havaldar

A-3 Harisha

Hearing History

Judge: 517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

31-01-2026

EVIDENCE

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE

04-12-2025

EVIDENCE

12-11-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

19-01-2017
Charge
04-09-2024
Deposition
14-07-2025
Deposition
14-07-2025
Deposition
15-10-2025
Deposition
31-01-2026
Deposition
31-01-2026
Deposition

Court Order Summary Case No.: CC 2409/2015, Additional Civil Judge & CJM, Kundapura Date: 31.01.2026 The court examined a criminal case involving alleged assault and abusive conduct on 10-02-2015. The defendant's counsel (Sri R.K.M.) argued that the complaint is false and malicious, claiming the case has been pending for 12 years without proper evidence. The defense contended that the accused did not use weapons and questioned the credibility of the allegations. The court admitted witness testimony and examination of the second accused proceeded, with remaining accused to be examined subsequently. The case remains ongoing with further examination of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case No.: CC 2409/2015, Additional Civil Judge & CJM, Kundapura Date: 31.01.2026 The court examined a criminal case involving alleged assault and abusive conduct on 10-02-2015. The defendant's counsel (Sri R.K.M.) argued that the complaint is false and malicious, claiming the case has been pending for 12 years without proper evidence. The defense contended that the accused did not use weapons and questioned the credibility of the allegations. The court admitted witness testimony and examination of the second accused proceeded, with remaining accused to be examined subsequently. The case remains ongoing with further examination of evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case