S.H.O. Gangolli Police Station vs Divakara — 2683/2025

Case under Prevention of Cruely to Animal Act, 1960 Section 11(1)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP330032422025

e-Filing Number

23-12-2025

Filing Number

2683/2025

Filing Date

23-Dec-2025

Registration No

2683/2025

Registration Date

23-Dec-2025

Court

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

517-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Cruely to Animal Act, 1960 Section 11(1)(a)
Karnataka Police Act Section 87,93

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.H.O. Gangolli Police Station

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Divakara

  2. 2.Ganesh

  3. 3.Ganesh

  4. 4.Prashanth

  5. 5.Babu H

  6. 6.Jayasheela Shetty

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Plea

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    Accused No. 5 pleaded guilty to offences under Section 11(1)(A) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 and Sections 87, 93 of the K.P. Act, and was convicted accordingly. The court imposed fines totaling Rs. 450 (Rs. 300 + Rs. 100 + Rs. 50) with 3 days simple imprisonment as default punishment for each offence, and confiscated seized cash amounts of Rs. 5,900 to the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 23-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2683/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Accused No. 5 pleaded guilty to offences under Section 11(1)(A) of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act 1960 and Sections 87, 93 of the K.P. Act, and was convicted accordingly. The court imposed fines totaling Rs. 450 (Rs. 300 + Rs. 100 + Rs. 50) with 3 days simple imprisonment as default punishment for each offence, and confiscated seized cash amounts of Rs. 5,900 to the state. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case