S.H.O. Gangolli Police Station vs Mohammed Rafiq — 2117/2019
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,304(A). Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP330027182019
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
2117/2019
Filing Date
05-08-2019
Registration No
2117/2019
Registration Date
05-08-2019
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.H.O. Gangolli Police Station
Adv. The APP Kundapura
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Rafiq
Hearing History
Judge: 517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
JUDGEMENT
Furnishing Surety
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 28-02-2026 | Furnishing Surety |
| 18-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 27-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 15-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The case (CC No. 2117/2019) relates to a motor vehicle accident investigation in Kundapura court. The court dismissed charges against the accused, finding significant deficiencies in the police investigation report including discrepancies in witness statements, missing vehicle details in the investigation report, and inconsistencies between the preliminary investigation and final report. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case against the accused due to procedural gaps and unreliable evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The case (CC No. 2117/2019) relates to a motor vehicle accident investigation in Kundapura court. The court dismissed charges against the accused, finding significant deficiencies in the police investigation report including discrepancies in witness statements, missing vehicle details in the investigation report, and inconsistencies between the preliminary investigation and final report. The court concluded that the prosecution failed to establish a credible case against the accused due to procedural gaps and unreliable evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts