Kundapura Rural P.S. vs KAJI AFFAN @ Kaji @ Affan — 1751/2022

Case under Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Prevn. Act, 1964 Section 4,5,7,12,(1),(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 22-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP330023382022

e-Filing Number

18-07-2022

Filing Number

1751/2022

Filing Date

18-Jul-2022

Registration No

1751/2022

Registration Date

18-Jul-2022

Court

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

517-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Prevn. Act, 1964 Section 4,5,7,12,(1),(2)
Indian Motar Vehicle Act Section 119,177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Kundapura Rural P.S.

    Adv. The APP Kundapura

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KAJI AFFAN @ Kaji @ Affan

Case History

  1. 22-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 27-Nov-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    Court Order Summary Case: CC No. 1751/2022, Kundapura Court (dated 27.11.2025) Outcome: The court found witness testimony was inconsistent and unreliable. The Additional Civil Judge rejected the witness account regarding alleged wrongful possession of items on 09-05-2022, noting the witness provided contradictory statements about the sequence of events and police procedures. The court noted procedural irregularities and ruled that the testimony could not support the claims made, effectively dismissing the assertions based on insufficient credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 29-Oct-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  8. 29-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 14-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 12-Jun-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 12-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 25-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 20-Mar-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  16. 20-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 20-Feb-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  18. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 27-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 07-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 07-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 28-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 19-Jul-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 10-Jun-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 06-Apr-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 05-Feb-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 28-Nov-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 06-Oct-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 20-Jul-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 15-Apr-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 03-Feb-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 16-Sep-2022

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 18-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 18-Jul-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1751/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Case: CC No. 1751/2022, Kundapura Court (dated 27.11.2025) Outcome: The court found witness testimony was inconsistent and unreliable. The Additional Civil Judge rejected the witness account regarding alleged wrongful possession of items on 09-05-2022, noting the witness provided contradictory statements about the sequence of events and police procedures. The court noted procedural irregularities and ruled that the testimony could not support the claims made, effectively dismissing the assertions based on insufficient credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case