Kundapura Rural P.S. vs KAJI AFFAN @ Kaji @ Affan — 1751/2022
Case under Karnataka Prevention of Cow Slaughter and Cattle Prevn. Act, 1964 Section 4,5,7,12,(1),(2). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP330023382022
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
e-Filing Number
18-07-2022
Filing Number
1751/2022
Filing Date
18-07-2022
Registration No
1751/2022
Registration Date
18-07-2022
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kundapura Rural P.S.
Adv. The APP Kundapura
Respondent(s)
KAJI AFFAN @ Kaji @ Affan
Hearing History
Judge: 517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 30-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 27-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: CC No. 1751/2022, Kundapura Court (dated 27.11.2025) Outcome: The court found witness testimony was inconsistent and unreliable. The Additional Civil Judge rejected the witness account regarding alleged wrongful possession of items on 09-05-2022, noting the witness provided contradictory statements about the sequence of events and police procedures. The court noted procedural irregularities and ruled that the testimony could not support the claims made, effectively dismissing the assertions based on insufficient credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: CC No. 1751/2022, Kundapura Court (dated 27.11.2025) Outcome: The court found witness testimony was inconsistent and unreliable. The Additional Civil Judge rejected the witness account regarding alleged wrongful possession of items on 09-05-2022, noting the witness provided contradictory statements about the sequence of events and police procedures. The court noted procedural irregularities and ruled that the testimony could not support the claims made, effectively dismissing the assertions based on insufficient credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts