S.H.O. KUNDAPURA POLICE STATION vs Krishna — 1603/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 457,380,379. Status: NOTICE. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP330022372018
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
Filing Number
1603/2018
Filing Date
25-08-2018
Registration No
1603/2018
Registration Date
25-08-2018
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.H.O. KUNDAPURA POLICE STATION
Adv. The APP Kundapura.
Respondent(s)
Krishna
A-2 Nataraj
A-3 Maroof
A-4 Rasheed alias Moiddin
Hearing History
Judge: 517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
NOTICE
CALL ON
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | NOTICE |
| 17-02-2026 | CALL ON |
| 14-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 15-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This court order is in Kannada and concerns a criminal case (CC No. 1603/2018) from the Additional Civil Judge and Pr. Dist. Magistrate Court in Kundapura, dated October 23, 2024. Summary: The court examined a case involving the alleged recovery of a stolen Maruti Swift car (registration KA-51-MN-1122) on December 25, 2017. The accused (Krishna Iswara Acharya) was apprehended after police stopped the vehicle and four occupants attempted to flee. The defense counsel argued that the police failed to properly investigate, lacked credible evidence linking the accused to the vehicle, and that the accused was not found in actual possession of the car. The court considered the prosecution's and defense's submissions regarding the arrest and subsequent investigation procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This court order is in Kannada and concerns a criminal case (CC No. 1603/2018) from the Additional Civil Judge and Pr. Dist. Magistrate Court in Kundapura, dated October 23, 2024. Summary: The court examined a case involving the alleged recovery of a stolen Maruti Swift car (registration KA-51-MN-1122) on December 25, 2017. The accused (Krishna Iswara Acharya) was apprehended after police stopped the vehicle and four occupants attempted to flee. The defense counsel argued that the police failed to properly investigate, lacked credible evidence linking the accused to the vehicle, and that the accused was not found in actual possession of the car. The court considered the prosecution's and defense's submissions regarding the arrest and subsequent investigation procedures. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts