S.H.O. Gangolli Police Station vs Moulana Asgar Ali — 1523/2020

Case under Indian Penal Code Section Sec.279,338,304(A). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 16-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP330020722020

Filing Number

1523/2020

Filing Date

13-Aug-2020

Registration No

1523/2020

Registration Date

13-Aug-2020

Court

ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

517-Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section Sec.279,338,304(A)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.S.H.O. Gangolli Police Station

    Adv. The APP Kundapura

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Moulana Asgar Ali

Case History

  1. 16-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 09-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    DepositionView PDF

    In Criminal Case No. 1523/2020 (PW-1) dated 03.12.2025, the court rejected the defendant's counsel's challenge regarding identification of the accused due to insufficient grounds. The court dismissed the petition challenging the witness identification and ruled that no valid objection exists. No further adjournment was granted, and the case proceeded based on the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 01-Sep-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 01-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 25-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 21-May-2025

    DepositionView PDF

  14. 21-May-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 05-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 04-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 31-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 31-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 26-Nov-2024

    PleaView PDF

  20. 26-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 24-Oct-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 18-Sep-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  23. 22-Aug-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  24. 12-Aug-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  25. 04-Jul-2024

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  26. 15-Jun-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  27. 22-Apr-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  28. 27-Mar-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  29. 15-Feb-2024

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  30. 19-Dec-2023

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  31. 27-Oct-2023

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  32. 07-Aug-2023

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  33. 06-Jun-2023

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  34. 24-Jan-2023

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  35. 08-Sep-2022

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  36. 05-May-2022

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  37. 18-Jan-2022

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  38. 05-Oct-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  39. 04-Jun-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  40. 09-Mar-2021

    Summons

    Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  41. 14-Dec-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  42. 13-Aug-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1523/2020

casestatus.in Summary

In Criminal Case No. 1523/2020 (PW-1) dated 03.12.2025, the court rejected the defendant's counsel's challenge regarding identification of the accused due to insufficient grounds. The court dismissed the petition challenging the witness identification and ruled that no valid objection exists. No further adjournment was granted, and the case proceeded based on the court's order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case