St. Milagres Credit Souharda Co-Op. Ltd, Kundapura, R/by its Manager Johnson vs Gurudath Acharya K. — 1208/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 04th May 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP330015782025
Next Hearing
04th May 2026
Filing Number
1208/2025
Filing Date
26-07-2025
Registration No
1208/2025
Registration Date
26-07-2025
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
St. Milagres Credit Souharda Co-Op. Ltd, Kundapura, R/by its Manager Johnson
Adv. Bhujanga Shetty Gavali
Respondent(s)
Gurudath Acharya K.
Hearing History
Judge: 517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-01-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
| 06-12-2025 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
| 17-10-2025 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
| 18-09-2025 | FRAMING OF CHARGE OR PLEA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: St. Milagres Credit Souharda Co-operative Ltd. vs. Gurudath Acharya K (C.C.No.1208-2025) Outcome: The accused has been charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 49,691 that was returned due to insufficient funds, and failing to comply with a legal notice or make payment. The court read over and explained the charges to the accused on 06.03.2026, with questions regarding his understanding and plea status left blank in the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: St. Milagres Credit Souharda Co-operative Ltd. vs. Gurudath Acharya K (C.C.No.1208-2025) Outcome: The accused has been charged under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a cheque for Rs. 49,691 that was returned due to insufficient funds, and failing to comply with a legal notice or make payment. The court read over and explained the charges to the accused on 06.03.2026, with questions regarding his understanding and plea status left blank in the order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts