S.H.O. KUNDAPURA POLICE STATION vs Prashanth Mogaveer — 163/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 263(d). Disposed: Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT on 10th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP330002082026
e-Filing Number
30-01-2026
Filing Number
163/2026
Filing Date
31-01-2026
Registration No
163/2026
Registration Date
31-01-2026
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Decision Date
10th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--COMMITTED TO SESSIONS COURT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.H.O. KUNDAPURA POLICE STATION
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Prashanth Mogaveer
Ragvendra Poojary
Adv. null
Sujay
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Disposed
COMMITTAL
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
Furnishing Surety
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 07-03-2026 | COMMITTAL |
| 05-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 25-02-2026 | Furnishing Surety |
| 13-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The I Additional Civil Judge & JMFC at Kundapura committed the case against three accused (Prashanth Mogaveer, Raghavendra Poojary, and Sujay) to the Court of Sessions, Udupi, for trial under Section 232 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The offences charged under Section 263(d) of BNS and Sections 57-58 of the Karnataka Prisons (Amendment) Act are exclusively triable by the Sessions Court. Accused No. 1 remains in judicial custody while Accused Nos. 2 and 3 are on bail with surety accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The I Additional Civil Judge & JMFC at Kundapura committed the case against three accused (Prashanth Mogaveer, Raghavendra Poojary, and Sujay) to the Court of Sessions, Udupi, for trial under Section 232 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS). The offences charged under Section 263(d) of BNS and Sections 57-58 of the Karnataka Prisons (Amendment) Act are exclusively triable by the Sessions Court. Accused No. 1 remains in judicial custody while Accused Nos. 2 and 3 are on bail with surety accepted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts