S.H.O. Gangolli Police Station vs Mohammed Riyaz — 4/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 506,341,143,147,148,149,323. Status: A.D.R.. Next hearing: 14th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP330000152021
Next Hearing
14th March 2026
e-Filing Number
02-01-2021
Filing Number
4/2021
Filing Date
02-01-2021
Registration No
4/2021
Registration Date
02-01-2021
Court
ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S.H.O. Gangolli Police Station
Adv. The APP Kundapura
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Riyaz
Asfak Ahammed
Mohammed Ashraf
Ahammed
Sathish Devadiga
Hearing History
Judge: 517-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
A.D.R.
NOTICE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | A.D.R. |
| 25-02-2026 | NOTICE |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court order from the Additional Civil Judge, Kundapura (dated 20.09.2025) in CC No. 4/2021 addresses a criminal matter involving accused persons and vehicle seizure. The defense counsel challenged the legality of the accused's custody and vehicle seizure, arguing lack of proper written orders and procedural irregularities. The court found merit in these objections, rejecting the prosecution's narrative regarding the arrest circumstances and seizure of two vehicles (KA-20-MB-6559 and KA-20-MA-3933). The case proceeded with witness examination, with 2 of 4 accused persons being examined before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order from the Additional Civil Judge, Kundapura (dated 20.09.2025) in CC No. 4/2021 addresses a criminal matter involving accused persons and vehicle seizure. The defense counsel challenged the legality of the accused's custody and vehicle seizure, arguing lack of proper written orders and procedural irregularities. The court found merit in these objections, rejecting the prosecution's narrative regarding the arrest circumstances and seizure of two vehicles (KA-20-MB-6559 and KA-20-MA-3933). The case proceeded with witness examination, with 2 of 4 accused persons being examined before the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts