Shri. Brahmi Durgaparameshwari Sowharda Sahakari Sangha Ltd., Rep. by Rohit K vs S. Arun Kumar Shetty — 1296/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP320032862023
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
Filing Number
1296/2023
Filing Date
02-11-2023
Registration No
1296/2023
Registration Date
02-11-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Brahmi Durgaparameshwari Sowharda Sahakari Sangha Ltd., Rep. by Rohit K
Adv. Smt. Anjali C. Hunderkar
Respondent(s)
S. Arun Kumar Shetty
Hearing History
Judge: 518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 31-12-2025 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Summary In Civil Case No. 1296/2023, dated 09-09-2025, the witness was examined regarding a loan dispute involving a society (Bahirundurga Premeshwari Society). The court found that the plaintiff and defendant's family members had obtained loans of one lakh rupees each from the society, with conflicting claims about repayment. The court concluded that the witness's testimony regarding loan disbursement and repayment was inconsistent and partly false, noting discrepancies in the documentation and contradictions in statements about the three family members involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Civil Case No. 1296/2023, dated 09-09-2025, the witness was examined regarding a loan dispute involving a society (Bahirundurga Premeshwari Society). The court found that the plaintiff and defendant's family members had obtained loans of one lakh rupees each from the society, with conflicting claims about repayment. The court concluded that the witness's testimony regarding loan disbursement and repayment was inconsistent and partly false, noting discrepancies in the documentation and contradictions in statements about the three family members involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts