Shri. Brahmi Durgaparameshwari Sowharda Sahakari Sangha Ltd., Rep. by Rohit K vs S. Arun Kumar Shetty — 1296/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP320032862023
Filing Number
1296/2023
Filing Date
02-Nov-2023
Registration No
1296/2023
Registration Date
02-Nov-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
518-II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Shri. Brahmi Durgaparameshwari Sowharda Sahakari Sangha Ltd., Rep. by Rohit K
Adv. Smt. Anjali C. Hunderkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.S. Arun Kumar Shetty
Case History
-
15-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Feb-2026
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Feb-2026
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Jan-2026
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Dec-2025
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Dec-2025
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Nov-2025
Hearing
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Oct-2025
Hearing
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Oct-2025
For Objections
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Sep-2025
For Objections
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Sep-2025
For Objections
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Sep-2025
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Sep-2025
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
Summary In Civil Case No. 1296/2023, dated 09-09-2025, the witness was examined regarding a loan dispute involving a society (Bahirundurga Premeshwari Society). The court found that the plaintiff and defendant's family members had obtained loans of one lakh rupees each from the society, with conflicting claims about repayment. The court concluded that the witness's testimony regarding loan disbursement and repayment was inconsistent and partly false, noting discrepancies in the documentation and contradictions in statements about the three family members involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Sep-2025
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Aug-2025
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Aug-2025
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
30-Jul-2025
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Jul-2025
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jul-2025
Defence Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Jul-2025
Defence Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-May-2025
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Apr-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
22-Apr-2025
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Mar-2025
For Objections
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Feb-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Feb-2025
Arguments
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jan-2025
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Dec-2024
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Nov-2024
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Oct-2024
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Sep-2024
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Sep-2024
PleaView PDF
-
18-Sep-2024
Evidence
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Aug-2024
Issue NBW
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jul-2024
Appearance Of Accussed
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-May-2024
Re Issue S/S To Accused
-
23-Apr-2024
Re Issue S/S To Accused
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jan-2024
Re Issue S/S To Accused
II Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-Nov-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 1296/2023
Summary In Civil Case No. 1296/2023, dated 09-09-2025, the witness was examined regarding a loan dispute involving a society (Bahirundurga Premeshwari Society). The court found that the plaintiff and defendant's family members had obtained loans of one lakh rupees each from the society, with conflicting claims about repayment. The court concluded that the witness's testimony regarding loan disbursement and repayment was inconsistent and partly false, noting discrepancies in the documentation and contradictions in statements about the three family members involved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts