Pursene Boat Meenugaarara Swa Sahaya Sadasya Sangha Gangolli, Rep by Devadas Mestha vs Mohammad Sayyad — 1018/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP320026952023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

1018/2023

Filing Date

20-10-2023

Registration No

1018/2023

Registration Date

20-10-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Petitioner(s)

Pursene Boat Meenugaarara Swa Sahaya Sadasya Sangha Gangolli, Rep by Devadas Mestha

Adv. B.Raghavendra charan Navada

Respondent(s)

Mohammad Sayyad

Hearing History

Judge: 518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

FOR OBJECTIONS

24-02-2026

FOR OBJECTIONS

20-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

19-07-2024
Plea
22-08-2024
Deposition
20-09-2024
Deposition
12-12-2024
313 Statement
30-07-2025
Deposition
20-02-2026
Deposition

Summary This is a civil court order from the 2nd Additional Civil Judge's Court, Kundapura (Case No. 852/2023, dated 20-02-2026) regarding a dispute involving bail/surety and check misuse allegations. The court examined witness testimony regarding a check provided as security and accusations of false complaints filed against the defendant. The court found the witness testimony credible and ruled against the defendant's claims of false allegations, rejecting the defendant's request for relief based on allegedly fabricated charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary This is a civil court order from the 2nd Additional Civil Judge's Court, Kundapura (Case No. 852/2023, dated 20-02-2026) regarding a dispute involving bail/surety and check misuse allegations. The court examined witness testimony regarding a check provided as security and accusations of false complaints filed against the defendant. The court found the witness testimony credible and ruled against the defendant's claims of false allegations, rejecting the defendant's request for relief based on allegedly fabricated charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case