No.7167, Purse-Seine Fishermen Primary Service Co-Operative Society Ltd.,Kota vs Sandesh — 1016/2023
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Status: FOR STEPS. Next hearing: 23rd March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP320026912023
Next Hearing
23rd March 2026
Filing Number
1016/2023
Filing Date
20-10-2023
Registration No
1016/2023
Registration Date
20-10-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
No.7167, Purse-Seine Fishermen Primary Service Co-Operative Society Ltd.,Kota
Adv. M. Sadananda Shetty
Respondent(s)
Sandesh
Hearing History
Judge: 518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
FOR STEPS
ISSUE NBW
FOR COMPLY
FOR COMPLY
FOR COMPLY
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | FOR STEPS |
| 06-02-2026 | ISSUE NBW |
| 06-01-2026 | FOR COMPLY |
| 11-12-2025 | FOR COMPLY |
| 26-11-2025 | FOR COMPLY |
Interim Orders
This document records the Statement of the Accused under Section 313 of CrPC (dated 12-03-2025) in a cheque bounce case filed by a fishermen's cooperative society against the accused Sandesh. The accused was questioned regarding allegations that he issued a cheque for Rs. 6,00,000 dated 02-05-2018 which was dishonored due to insufficient funds, allegedly with intent to defraud the complainant. The document shows the accused was given the opportunity to respond to the charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act but provided no substantive answers to any of the questions posed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document records the Statement of the Accused under Section 313 of CrPC (dated 12-03-2025) in a cheque bounce case filed by a fishermen's cooperative society against the accused Sandesh. The accused was questioned regarding allegations that he issued a cheque for Rs. 6,00,000 dated 02-05-2018 which was dishonored due to insufficient funds, allegedly with intent to defraud the complainant. The document shows the accused was given the opportunity to respond to the charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act but provided no substantive answers to any of the questions posed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts