Pursene Boat Meenugaarara Swa Sahaya Sadasya Sangha Gangolli, Rep by Devadas Mestha vs Mohammed Sayyad — 852/2023

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP320023592023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

852/2023

Filing Date

17-10-2023

Registration No

852/2023

Registration Date

17-10-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881

Petitioner(s)

Pursene Boat Meenugaarara Swa Sahaya Sadasya Sangha Gangolli, Rep by Devadas Mestha

Adv. B.Raghavendra charan Navada

Respondent(s)

Mohammed Sayyad

Hearing History

Judge: 518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

09-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-03-2026

FOR OBJECTIONS

24-02-2026

FOR OBJECTIONS

20-02-2026

EVIDENCE

30-01-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

13-05-2024
Plea
22-08-2024
Deposition
20-09-2024
Deposition
12-12-2024
313 Statement
13-08-2025
Deposition
08-10-2025
Deposition
12-01-2026
Deposition
20-02-2026
Deposition

Summary In Civil Case No. 852/2023 before the 2nd Additional Civil Judge's Court, Kundapura, the court heard testimony on 20-02-2026 and examined documents marked as exhibits. The court found the witness testimony to be unreliable and rejected the plaintiff's claims as false allegations. The court dismissed the plaintiff's case, holding that the defendant had provided satisfactory explanations regarding the check issued and the alleged breach of trust, and that no wrongdoing was substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Civil Case No. 852/2023 before the 2nd Additional Civil Judge's Court, Kundapura, the court heard testimony on 20-02-2026 and examined documents marked as exhibits. The court found the witness testimony to be unreliable and rejected the plaintiff's claims as false allegations. The court dismissed the plaintiff's case, holding that the defendant had provided satisfactory explanations regarding the check issued and the alleged breach of trust, and that no wrongdoing was substantiated. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case