G. Fakir Beary vs G. Abdul Khadar Advocate - T. Balachandra Shetty — 392/2017
Case under Under Section 26, Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc 1908 Section 68. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320018492017
Filing Number
394/2017
Filing Date
10-Nov-2017
Registration No
392/2017
Registration Date
13-Nov-2017
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
516-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
Last updated 12-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.G. Fakir Beary
Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty
Respondent(s)
-
1.G. Abdul Khadar Advocate - T. Balachandra Shetty
-
2.Mr. Khathijabi, 76 Years
Adv. T. Balachandra Shetty
-
3.G. Hasanabba, 72 Years
Adv. T. Balachandra Shetty
-
4.Mrs. Aysha, 70 Years
Adv. T. Balachandra Shetty
-
5.Mrs. Zubeda, 66 Years
Adv. T. Balachandra Shetty
-
6.Mr. Ashfaq G.H., 24 Years
Adv. T. Balachandra Shetty
Case History
-
09-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Summary In Civil Case No. 392/2017 from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura, the court held hearings on 06-03-2026. The judge rejected several contentions by the plaintiff's counsel regarding involvement in a related case (O.S. No. 7), property ownership claims, and inheritance matters related to Sheikh Bari's estate. The court found that the plaintiff lacked standing in the previous case, that the settlement and decree proceedings did not involve the plaintiff, and that insufficient evidence supported claims of property rights. The matter was adjourned for further proceedings with no re-examination ordered, pending consideration of property-related documents and the plaintiff's substantive claims on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Feb-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Dec-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Sep-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
19-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Sep-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
24-Jul-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Jun-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
26-Jun-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Apr-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
07-Mar-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jan-2025
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
30-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Dec-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Nov-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Oct-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
29-Aug-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jul-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
31-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Jul-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
18-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
02-Jul-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Jun-2024
DepositionView PDF
-
25-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
03-Jun-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Apr-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Mar-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Feb-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jan-2024
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Dec-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Nov-2023
DepositionView PDF
-
22-Nov-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
25-Oct-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Sep-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
18-Aug-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Jul-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jun-2023
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Apr-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
16-Mar-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Feb-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Feb-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Feb-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Jan-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jan-2023
For Amendment Of Plaint
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Dec-2022
Objection To IA
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
06-Sep-2022
Objection To IA
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
22-Jun-2022
Objection To IA
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Jan-2022
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
24-Nov-2021
Notice
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Jun-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Feb-2021
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Nov-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Sep-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Jul-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
05-Jun-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
10-Mar-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Feb-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
09-Jan-2020
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Dec-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
08-Nov-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
21-Sep-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
11-Jul-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jun-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
20-Mar-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
31-Jan-2019
Evidence
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Jan-2019
Issues
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
23-Oct-2018
Issues
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
04-Sep-2018
Issues
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
26-Jul-2018
Issues
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
27-Jun-2018
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
19-Apr-2018
Hearing
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
01-Mar-2018
Objection To IA
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
15-Dec-2017
Objection To IA
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
12-Dec-2017
Objection To IA
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
14-Nov-2017
Summons
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC
-
13-Nov-2017
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Nov-2017
Case filed
Registration No. 392/2017
Summary In Civil Case No. 392/2017 from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura, the court held hearings on 06-03-2026. The judge rejected several contentions by the plaintiff's counsel regarding involvement in a related case (O.S. No. 7), property ownership claims, and inheritance matters related to Sheikh Bari's estate. The court found that the plaintiff lacked standing in the previous case, that the settlement and decree proceedings did not involve the plaintiff, and that insufficient evidence supported claims of property rights. The matter was adjourned for further proceedings with no re-examination ordered, pending consideration of property-related documents and the plaintiff's substantive claims on the merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts