G. Anantha Padmanabha Adiga vs Y. Karunakara Shetty Advocate - Balakrishna Shetty — 366/2019
Case under Under Section 26 and Order Vii Rule 1 and 3 of Cpc 1908 Section 90. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320018352019
Next Hearing
18th March 2026
Filing Number
367/2019
Filing Date
20-09-2019
Registration No
366/2019
Registration Date
21-09-2019
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
G. Anantha Padmanabha Adiga
Adv. Madhava Rao Matti
Respondent(s)
Y. Karunakara Shetty Advocate - Balakrishna Shetty
Hearing History
Judge: 516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 05-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 27-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 23-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
This civil court order from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC in Kundapura (Case No. 366/2019, dated 02-07-2025) records the examination-in-chief of a witness in a property dispute case. The witness testified regarding ownership of Survey No. 45/4 (62 cents of land), claiming to have purchased it in 2012 from one Subramanya Dareswamy. The witness's testimony was marked and recorded, addressing chain of title, document verification, and conflicting claims over the eastern 31-cent portion of the property. The case proceeded with witness examination; no final order on the merits was passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This civil court order from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC in Kundapura (Case No. 366/2019, dated 02-07-2025) records the examination-in-chief of a witness in a property dispute case. The witness testified regarding ownership of Survey No. 45/4 (62 cents of land), claiming to have purchased it in 2012 from one Subramanya Dareswamy. The witness's testimony was marked and recorded, addressing chain of title, document verification, and conflicting claims over the eastern 31-cent portion of the property. The case proceeded with witness examination; no final order on the merits was passed on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts