S K Goldsmith Industrial Co Operative Society Ltd Kundapura Branch vs Sandeep — 683/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section Sec.138. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUP320016752024
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
683/2024
Filing Date
18-07-2024
Registration No
683/2024
Registration Date
18-07-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
S K Goldsmith Industrial Co Operative Society Ltd Kundapura Branch
Adv. Sharmila V.
Respondent(s)
Sandeep
Hearing History
Judge: 516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
HEARING
HEARING
FOR OBJECTIONS
FOR OBJECTIONS
FOR OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 23-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 18-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTIONS |
| 20-01-2026 | FOR OBJECTIONS |
| 22-12-2025 | FOR OBJECTIONS |
Interim Orders
The court case (CC No. 683/2024) dated 04-08-2025 found that the accused obtained blank signed checks from the complainant and fraudulently filled them with false information before presenting them to the bank. The court determined the accused lacked financial capacity to repay the loan amount (3 lakhs with 6,000-7,000 already paid) and ruled that no relief could be granted in this case, dismissing the accused's petition. The misuse of the blank checks and discrepancies in signatures constituted criminal fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court case (CC No. 683/2024) dated 04-08-2025 found that the accused obtained blank signed checks from the complainant and fraudulently filled them with false information before presenting them to the bank. The court determined the accused lacked financial capacity to repay the loan amount (3 lakhs with 6,000-7,000 already paid) and ruled that no relief could be granted in this case, dismissing the accused's petition. The misuse of the blank checks and discrepancies in signatures constituted criminal fraud. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts