Gopala Poojary vs Anantha Poojary — 385/2018

Case under Under Section 26, Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc 1908 Section 68. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP320016492018

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

16th March 2026

Filing Number

385/2018

Filing Date

20-09-2018

Registration No

385/2018

Registration Date

24-09-2018

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Under Section 26, Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc 1908 Section 68

Petitioner(s)

Gopala Poojary

Adv. Madhava Rao Matti

Respondent(s)

Anantha Poojary

Harish Poojary

Lakshmi Poojarthi

Babu Poojary

Narayana Poojary

Sheena Poojary

Bhaskar Poojary

Shyamala Poojarthi

Minor Sichnala

Minor Sahana

Shantha Poojarthi

Minor Dilshan

Minor Disha

Vijayeendra

Prashantha

Subhas

Supreetha

Minor Anvitha

Devandra Poojary

Joga Poojary

Bebi Poojathi

Eeru Poojarthi

Rudru Poojarthi

Umesh Poojary

Shobha Poojarthi

Minor Artha

Minor Manvitha

Ganesh Poojary

Rathna Poojarthi

Aruna Poojary

Ashwini Poojarthi

Minor Thanmayeei

Vittal Poojary

Padmavathi Poojarthi

Mamatha

Chaithra

Gulabi Poojarthi

Chinmayee

Minor Archana

Minor Akshatha

Shekhara Poojary

Sreemathi Poojarthi

Minor Ananya

Minor Harshitha

Rajeeva Poojary

Venkatesh Poojary

Hearing History

Judge: 518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

27-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

20-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

16-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

06-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

25-09-2018
Orders
03-07-2020
Issue
29-07-2024
Deposition
13-06-2024
Orders
16-04-2025
Deposition
12-11-2025
Deposition

Case Summary Court: 2nd Additional Civil Judge and J.M.M.F.C., Kundapura Case No.: O.S. 385/2018 Order Date: 12-11-2025 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found the witness testimony unreliable and contradictory regarding property ownership claims in a civil dispute. The court concluded that the plaintiff failed to establish clear title to the disputed agricultural property (9 plots of land in Bolle, Kundapura) and rejected the plaintiff's declaratory petition for ownership based on insufficient and conflicting evidence presented during examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court: 2nd Additional Civil Judge and J.M.M.F.C., Kundapura Case No.: O.S. 385/2018 Order Date: 12-11-2025 Outcome: The petition was dismissed. The court found the witness testimony unreliable and contradictory regarding property ownership claims in a civil dispute. The court concluded that the plaintiff failed to establish clear title to the disputed agricultural property (9 plots of land in Bolle, Kundapura) and rejected the plaintiff's declaratory petition for ownership based on insufficient and conflicting evidence presented during examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case