Mr. Shankar Hegde vs Smt. Jayasheela Shedthi — 235/2016
Case under Under Section 26 , Order 7, Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc Section 65. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320015842016
Next Hearing
17th June 2026
Filing Number
235/2016
Filing Date
13-07-2016
Registration No
235/2016
Registration Date
15-07-2016
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mr. Shankar Hegde
Adv. T. Balachandra Shetty
Respondent(s)
Smt. Jayasheela Shedthi
Mr. Mohandas Shetty - 42 yrs
Mr. Sujaya Shetty-38 yrs
Smt. Shantha.S. Hegde -75 yrs
Mr. Prakash Hegde - 54 Yrs
Smt. Jayasheela Shetty - 50 Yrs
Jayashree Shetty-48 Yrs
Hearing History
Judge: 518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
OBJECTION TO IA
OBJECTION TO IA
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-11-2025 | OBJECTION TO IA |
| 29-08-2025 | OBJECTION TO IA |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 235/2016 | Date: 05-03-2025 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's suit for declaration of ownership rights over the disputed property (Survey No. 110/3 P2, 1 acre). The court found that the plaintiff's ownership is valid and that no dispute exists regarding the division of the property among three co-owners (plaintiff receiving 40 cents, first defendant 50 cents, and plaintiff's brother 4 cents) as per the 1974 records. The case is decided in favor of the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case No.: O.S. 235/2016 | Date: 05-03-2025 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's suit for declaration of ownership rights over the disputed property (Survey No. 110/3 P2, 1 acre). The court found that the plaintiff's ownership is valid and that no dispute exists regarding the division of the property among three co-owners (plaintiff receiving 40 cents, first defendant 50 cents, and plaintiff's brother 4 cents) as per the 1974 records. The case is decided in favor of the plaintiff. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts