Smt. Pushpa Naik vs Smt. Saroja — 901/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 15-Apr-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP320013792025

Filing Number

901/2025

Filing Date

29-Aug-2025

Registration No

901/2025

Registration Date

29-Aug-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

516-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Pushpa Naik

    Adv. Ravikiran Murdeshwar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Saroja

Case History

  1. 15-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 03-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In Civil Case No. 901/2025 at the Principal Civil Court, Kundapura, the court heard arguments on 03-02-2026. The court admitted five documentary exhibits (check dated 28-07-2025, authorized person's signature, bank statement, office notice dated 03-07-2025, and postal receipts) as evidence marked NI.P-1 through NI.P-5. The respondent's counsel requested time to file a written reply, which was granted, and the matter stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 03-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 29-Aug-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 29-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 901/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Civil Case No. 901/2025 at the Principal Civil Court, Kundapura, the court heard arguments on 03-02-2026. The court admitted five documentary exhibits (check dated 28-07-2025, authorized person's signature, bank statement, office notice dated 03-07-2025, and postal receipts) as evidence marked NI.P-1 through NI.P-5. The respondent's counsel requested time to file a written reply, which was granted, and the matter stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case