Anish Poonthelil Vargese, Rep.by his father/G.P.A.Holder Vargese P.K. vs The Deputy Commissioner, Udupi — 140/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/Sec.26,Or.VII,R1. Status: FOR CLARIFICATION. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320009062024
Next Hearing
16th March 2026
Filing Number
140/2024
Filing Date
01-06-2024
Registration No
140/2024
Registration Date
04-06-2024
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anish Poonthelil Vargese, Rep.by his father/G.P.A.Holder Vargese P.K.
Adv. PRADEEP P.J.
Respondent(s)
The Deputy Commissioner, Udupi
The Registrar of Birth and Death, Kundapura
Hearing History
Judge: 516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
FOR CLARIFICATION
FOR CLARIFICATION
FOR CLARIFICATION
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-03-2026 | FOR CLARIFICATION |
| 09-03-2026 | FOR CLARIFICATION |
| 06-03-2026 | FOR CLARIFICATION |
| 28-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 19-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 140/2024, Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Kundapura (Kannada) Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected all five contentions raised by the petitioner regarding discrepancies in birth certificate names and found no valid grounds to support the claims of fraud or misrepresentation against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: O.S. No. 140/2024, Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Kundapura (Kannada) Outcome: The petition is dismissed. The court rejected all five contentions raised by the petitioner regarding discrepancies in birth certificate names and found no valid grounds to support the claims of fraud or misrepresentation against the respondent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts