Smt. Maina N Shetty vs Smt. Rohini S Rai — 205/2014
Case under Section U.S.26,Or.VIIR.1to3ofCPC. Status: AWAIT MEDIATION REPORT. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320008812014
Next Hearing
06th April 2026
Filing Number
206/2014
Filing Date
03-07-2014
Registration No
205/2014
Registration Date
03-07-2014
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Maina N Shetty
Adv. GsKS
Respondent(s)
Smt. Rohini S Rai
Sri Prasanna Rai S.
Smt. Shobha K Shetty
Sri Mohidhar K Shetty
Hearing History
Judge: 518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
AWAIT MEDIATION REPORT
AWAIT MEDIATION REPORT
AWAIT MEDIATION REPORT
AWAIT MEDIATION REPORT
WRITTEN STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 03-07-3014 | AWAIT MEDIATION REPORT |
| 06-03-2026 | AWAIT MEDIATION REPORT |
| 26-02-2026 | AWAIT MEDIATION REPORT |
| 16-02-2026 | AWAIT MEDIATION REPORT |
| 07-01-2026 | WRITTEN STATEMENT |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 205/2014 | Date: 11-03-2025 | Court: Kadapur, Karnataka The court examined a property dispute involving Survey No. 118/9 (measuring 2 acres 51 cents) and related land parcels. The plaintiffs claimed ownership through a 1945 partition document, while defendants (Krishnapal Shetty and others) contested this, arguing lack of proper documentation. The court found that the original 1945 partition document did not conclusively establish Krishnapal Shetty's ownership, and that the defendants failed to produce valid evidence supporting their claims. The case was adjourned for further hearing with time granted to parties, with the court noting that portions of the disputed land (93 cents and 4 cents) appeared to belong to Lakshmi Shetty's family based on 1952 partition records and a 1972 suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: O.S. No. 205/2014 | Date: 11-03-2025 | Court: Kadapur, Karnataka The court examined a property dispute involving Survey No. 118/9 (measuring 2 acres 51 cents) and related land parcels. The plaintiffs claimed ownership through a 1945 partition document, while defendants (Krishnapal Shetty and others) contested this, arguing lack of proper documentation. The court found that the original 1945 partition document did not conclusively establish Krishnapal Shetty's ownership, and that the defendants failed to produce valid evidence supporting their claims. The case was adjourned for further hearing with time granted to parties, with the court noting that portions of the disputed land (93 cents and 4 cents) appeared to belong to Lakshmi Shetty's family based on 1952 partition records and a 1972 suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts