M/s ATOM VENTURES) A Sole proprietary Firm Rep. by its partner Sri Sharath Jayaram vs Harish — 99/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/s.26,Or.VII,R.1r/wS.151. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 03rd August 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320004432025
Next Hearing
03rd August 2026
Filing Number
99/2025
Filing Date
19-04-2025
Registration No
99/2025
Registration Date
22-04-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/s ATOM VENTURES) A Sole proprietary Firm Rep. by its partner Sri Sharath Jayaram
Adv. Rajshekar Navada
Respondent(s)
Harish
Nagesh
Sathish
Krishna
Harish
Nagesh
Hearing History
Judge: 518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
WRITTEN STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 14-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 25-07-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-06-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENT |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction (TI) restraining defendants from causing waste or damages to the suit 'A' schedule properties and interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession, finding the plaintiff established a prima facie case of ownership through registered sale deeds. Suit summons and emergent notice on I.A. No. 2 shall be issued to defendants, with the matter returnable on 02-05-2025, subject to plaintiff's compliance with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and payment of court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court granted a temporary injunction (TI) restraining defendants from causing waste or damages to the suit 'A' schedule properties and interfering with the plaintiff's peaceful possession, finding the plaintiff established a prima facie case of ownership through registered sale deeds. Suit summons and emergent notice on I.A. No. 2 shall be issued to defendants, with the matter returnable on 02-05-2025, subject to plaintiff's compliance with CPC Order 39 Rule 3 and payment of court fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts