S.H.O. Shankaranarayana P.S. vs Dinakar Shetty — 111/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP320004432024

JUDGEMENT

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Number

111/2024

Filing Date

27-05-2024

Registration No

111/2024

Registration Date

27-05-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338

Petitioner(s)

S.H.O. Shankaranarayana P.S.

Adv. APP Kundapura

Respondent(s)

Dinakar Shetty

Hearing History

Judge: 516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

27-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

30-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

23-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

13-01-2026

ARGUMENTS

Interim Orders

16-07-2024
Deposition
16-07-2024
Deposition
16-12-2024
Deposition
30-06-2025
Deposition

This is a judicial order from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC court in Kundapura (Karnataka) documenting witness testimony in a case (CC No. 111/24) relating to a road traffic accident on 12-10-2016. The court recorded testimony from Dr. Pradyumnabh Acharya, a 60-year-old doctor, who examined three injured persons and documented their injuries as per medical examination reports. The document contains detailed medical findings of injuries sustained by the victims and arguments from the accused's counsel challenging the nature and timing of the injuries. The court admitted medical certificates as evidence (marked as Exhibits NP-13, NP-14, and NP-15) and concluded the witness examination with no further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a judicial order from the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC court in Kundapura (Karnataka) documenting witness testimony in a case (CC No. 111/24) relating to a road traffic accident on 12-10-2016. The court recorded testimony from Dr. Pradyumnabh Acharya, a 60-year-old doctor, who examined three injured persons and documented their injuries as per medical examination reports. The document contains detailed medical findings of injuries sustained by the victims and arguments from the accused's counsel challenging the nature and timing of the injuries. The court admitted medical certificates as evidence (marked as Exhibits NP-13, NP-14, and NP-15) and concluded the witness examination with no further cross-examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case