Sheshamma Shedthi vs Rathnavathi Poojarthi — 154/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S26,OVII,R,1. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP320002992023

ISSUES

Next Hearing

24th June 2026

Filing Number

154/2023

Filing Date

05-04-2023

Registration No

154/2023

Registration Date

10-04-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA

Judge

516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S26,OVII,R,1

Petitioner(s)

Sheshamma Shedthi

Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty

V Prabhakar Shetty

Respondent(s)

Rathnavathi Poojarthi

Hearing History

Judge: 516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

ISSUES

10-02-2026

FOR OBJECTIONS

08-01-2026

FOR OBJECTIONS

06-11-2025

FOR OBJECTIONS

08-09-2025

FOR OBJECTIONS

Interim Orders

29-11-2023
Orders
29-11-2023
Orders

Case Summary Original Suit No. 154/2023 | Kundapura Court | 29 November 2023 The court allowed Interim Application (I.A.) No. III filed by the plaintiffs seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner. The plaintiffs alleged illegal encroachment of their property by the defendant through unauthorized construction of a compound wall. The court found that at the interim stage, it was impossible to ascertain the exact extent of the alleged encroachment (0.06 or 0.04 acres) based on available revenue records, and therefore appointed a Commissioner to inspect the suit and counter-claim schedule properties to determine the actual encroachment and aid in adjudication of the dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Original Suit No. 154/2023 | Kundapura Court | 29 November 2023 The court allowed Interim Application (I.A.) No. III filed by the plaintiffs seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner. The plaintiffs alleged illegal encroachment of their property by the defendant through unauthorized construction of a compound wall. The court found that at the interim stage, it was impossible to ascertain the exact extent of the alleged encroachment (0.06 or 0.04 acres) based on available revenue records, and therefore appointed a Commissioner to inspect the suit and counter-claim schedule properties to determine the actual encroachment and aid in adjudication of the dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case