Sheshamma Shedthi vs Rathnavathi Poojarthi — 154/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S26,OVII,R,1. Status: ISSUES. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320002992023
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
154/2023
Filing Date
05-04-2023
Registration No
154/2023
Registration Date
10-04-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sheshamma Shedthi
Adv. Malyady Jayarama Shetty
V Prabhakar Shetty
Respondent(s)
Rathnavathi Poojarthi
Hearing History
Judge: 516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
ISSUES
FOR OBJECTIONS
FOR OBJECTIONS
FOR OBJECTIONS
FOR OBJECTIONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ISSUES |
| 10-02-2026 | FOR OBJECTIONS |
| 08-01-2026 | FOR OBJECTIONS |
| 06-11-2025 | FOR OBJECTIONS |
| 08-09-2025 | FOR OBJECTIONS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Original Suit No. 154/2023 | Kundapura Court | 29 November 2023 The court allowed Interim Application (I.A.) No. III filed by the plaintiffs seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner. The plaintiffs alleged illegal encroachment of their property by the defendant through unauthorized construction of a compound wall. The court found that at the interim stage, it was impossible to ascertain the exact extent of the alleged encroachment (0.06 or 0.04 acres) based on available revenue records, and therefore appointed a Commissioner to inspect the suit and counter-claim schedule properties to determine the actual encroachment and aid in adjudication of the dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Original Suit No. 154/2023 | Kundapura Court | 29 November 2023 The court allowed Interim Application (I.A.) No. III filed by the plaintiffs seeking appointment of a Court Commissioner. The plaintiffs alleged illegal encroachment of their property by the defendant through unauthorized construction of a compound wall. The court found that at the interim stage, it was impossible to ascertain the exact extent of the alleged encroachment (0.06 or 0.04 acres) based on available revenue records, and therefore appointed a Commissioner to inspect the suit and counter-claim schedule properties to determine the actual encroachment and aid in adjudication of the dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts