Jyothi Holla vs Nagaraja Basri — 153/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Sec.26, Order VII, Rule 1, 2. Status: AWAIT RECORD. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320002982023
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
153/2023
Filing Date
31-03-2023
Registration No
153/2023
Registration Date
10-04-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jyothi Holla
Adv. T. Gurumurthy Rao
Respondent(s)
Nagaraja Basri
Hearing History
Judge: 518-II ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
AWAIT RECORD
AWAIT ORDER
AWAIT ORDER
AWAIT ORDER
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | AWAIT RECORD |
| 14-01-2026 | AWAIT ORDER |
| 19-11-2025 | AWAIT ORDER |
| 12-09-2025 | AWAIT ORDER |
| 01-08-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Suit No. 153/2023, District Court, Kundapura Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's (Jyoti Holl's) interim application seeking temporary injunction to prevent the defendant (Nagaraj Basi) from interfering with the deity worship and temple management at the Sri Pardhavari Vinayak Temple located on the disputed property. Conversely, the court granted the defendant's counter-application, issuing a temporary injunction to prevent the plaintiff and their relatives from obstructing the defendant's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the scheduled property until the main case is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Case: Civil Suit No. 153/2023, District Court, Kundapura Outcome: The court dismissed the plaintiff's (Jyoti Holl's) interim application seeking temporary injunction to prevent the defendant (Nagaraj Basi) from interfering with the deity worship and temple management at the Sri Pardhavari Vinayak Temple located on the disputed property. Conversely, the court granted the defendant's counter-application, issuing a temporary injunction to prevent the plaintiff and their relatives from obstructing the defendant's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the scheduled property until the main case is decided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts