NARNARESH KUMAR SHETTY vs K.SACHIDANANDA HEGDE Advocate - G. Santhosh Kumar Shetty — 28/2011
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/S,26 O VII R,1 ,151. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 29th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP320001462011
Next Hearing
29th April 2026
Filing Date
03-02-2011
Registration No
28/2011
Registration Date
03-02-2011
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KUNDAPURA
Judge
516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NARNARESH KUMAR SHETTY
Adv. M. Sadananda Shetty
Respondent(s)
K.SACHIDANANDA HEGDE Advocate - G. Santhosh Kumar Shetty
Hearing History
Judge: 516-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 24-11-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this civil case (O.S. No. 28/2011) before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura, the court examined witness testimony on 23-02-2026. The defendant's counsel challenged the measurement and survey work, objecting to the admissibility of certain survey references (Survey No. 251 and 534) and measurements taken based on possession. The court rejected these objections and directed that the case proceed to resolution in the civil court itself, noting that no remeasurement was required. The matter was decided without further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this civil case (O.S. No. 28/2011) before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC, Kundapura, the court examined witness testimony on 23-02-2026. The defendant's counsel challenged the measurement and survey work, objecting to the admissibility of certain survey references (Survey No. 251 and 534) and measurements taken based on possession. The court rejected these objections and directed that the case proceed to resolution in the civil court itself, noting that no remeasurement was required. The matter was decided without further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts