Sudarshan Ganiga vs Thritish @ Tritish Shridhar Naik — 1130/2024
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP310013352024
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
1130/2024
Filing Date
05-12-2024
Registration No
1130/2024
Registration Date
12-12-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA
Judge
515-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudarshan Ganiga
Adv. Jagadish Rao K.
Respondent(s)
Thritish @ Tritish Shridhar Naik
United India Insurance Co.Ltd.,Kerala, Rep.by its Branch Manager
Iffco Tokio General insurance Co. Ltd
Hearing History
Judge: 515-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA
OBJECTION
NOTICE
NOTICE
NOTICE
OBJECTION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 11-02-2026 | NOTICE |
| 07-01-2026 | NOTICE |
| 29-11-2025 | NOTICE |
| 15-10-2025 | OBJECTION |
Interim Orders
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Kundapura framed four issues in case MVC 959/2024 on 14th August 2025. The case involves a motor accident claim by petitioner Sudharshana Ganiga, who suffered injuries in a road traffic accident on 29-07-2024 caused by negligent riding by the motorcycle rider (respondent No.1). The tribunal will adjudicate whether the petitioner proved his injuries/disability, whether the insurance company can claim policy violations to evade liability, and determine the appropriate compensation quantum and liable party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT) in Kundapura framed four issues in case MVC 959/2024 on 14th August 2025. The case involves a motor accident claim by petitioner Sudharshana Ganiga, who suffered injuries in a road traffic accident on 29-07-2024 caused by negligent riding by the motorcycle rider (respondent No.1). The tribunal will adjudicate whether the petitioner proved his injuries/disability, whether the insurance company can claim policy violations to evade liability, and determine the appropriate compensation quantum and liable party. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts