Manjunatha Ranga Naik vs Ramu Ganapu Gouda — 57/2025

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAUP310001382025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

25th April 2026

Filing Number

57/2025

Filing Date

18-01-2025

Registration No

57/2025

Registration Date

01-02-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA

Judge

515-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166

Petitioner(s)

Manjunatha Ranga Naik

Respondent(s)

Ramu Ganapu Gouda

Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd.,Mangalore, By its Divisional Manager

Hearing History

Judge: 515-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

23-01-2026

EVIDENCE

29-11-2025

EVIDENCE

09-10-2025

EVIDENCE

17-09-2025

WRITTEN STATEMENT

Interim Orders

09-10-2025
Issue

This is an order from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Kundapura that frames issues rather than delivers a final judgment. The case involves a motor accident claim filed by Sri Manjunath Ranga Naik against Sri Ramu Ganapu Gouda and an insurance company, arising from a road traffic accident on 08-11-2024 where the petitioner sustained injuries as a pillion rider. Four issues have been framed for adjudication, including whether the petitioner proved his injuries and disability, whether the insurance company's policy exclusions apply, and the quantum of compensation owed—with the case proceeding to evidence and hearing stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is an order from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Kundapura that frames issues rather than delivers a final judgment. The case involves a motor accident claim filed by Sri Manjunath Ranga Naik against Sri Ramu Ganapu Gouda and an insurance company, arising from a road traffic accident on 08-11-2024 where the petitioner sustained injuries as a pillion rider. Four issues have been framed for adjudication, including whether the petitioner proved his injuries and disability, whether the insurance company's policy exclusions apply, and the quantum of compensation owed—with the case proceeding to evidence and hearing stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case