Manjunatha Ranga Naik vs Ramu Ganapu Gouda — 57/2025
Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP310001382025
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
Filing Number
57/2025
Filing Date
18-01-2025
Registration No
57/2025
Registration Date
01-02-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA
Judge
515-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manjunatha Ranga Naik
Respondent(s)
Ramu Ganapu Gouda
Bajaj Allianz General Insurance Co.Ltd.,Mangalore, By its Divisional Manager
Hearing History
Judge: 515-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
WRITTEN STATEMENT
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 09-10-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-09-2025 | WRITTEN STATEMENT |
Interim Orders
This is an order from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Kundapura that frames issues rather than delivers a final judgment. The case involves a motor accident claim filed by Sri Manjunath Ranga Naik against Sri Ramu Ganapu Gouda and an insurance company, arising from a road traffic accident on 08-11-2024 where the petitioner sustained injuries as a pillion rider. Four issues have been framed for adjudication, including whether the petitioner proved his injuries and disability, whether the insurance company's policy exclusions apply, and the quantum of compensation owed—with the case proceeding to evidence and hearing stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This is an order from the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Kundapura that frames issues rather than delivers a final judgment. The case involves a motor accident claim filed by Sri Manjunath Ranga Naik against Sri Ramu Ganapu Gouda and an insurance company, arising from a road traffic accident on 08-11-2024 where the petitioner sustained injuries as a pillion rider. Four issues have been framed for adjudication, including whether the petitioner proved his injuries and disability, whether the insurance company's policy exclusions apply, and the quantum of compensation owed—with the case proceeding to evidence and hearing stages. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts