Raju vs Balakrishna — 6/2024

Case under Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAUP310000302024

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

16th April 2026

Filing Number

6/2024

Filing Date

02-01-2024

Registration No

6/2024

Registration Date

08-01-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA

Judge

515-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicle Act 1988 Section U/s166

Petitioner(s)

Raju

Adv. Shashidhara Hegde

Respondent(s)

Balakrishna

The HDFC Ergo General Insurance Company Ltd.,Mangaluru.

Hearing History

Judge: 515-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE

05-01-2026

EVIDENCE

10-12-2025

EVIDENCE

10-11-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

03-06-2025
Issue
28-06-2025
Deposition
01-09-2025
Deposition
25-09-2025
Deposition

This is a Motor Vehicle Compensation (MVC) case (MVC 6/2024) heard on 25-09-2025. The court recorded the testimony of the first witness (claimant) who testified about a motor vehicle accident that occurred around 7:00 PM, where he was hit from behind by a pickup vehicle while delivering milk. He stated he received 12 days of inpatient treatment, suffered no permanent disability, and claimed daily wages of Rs. 700 as a casual laborer at age 53. Cross-examination of the witness was completed with no further examination required. The case appears to be proceeding through the evidence stage of the compensation claim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

This is a Motor Vehicle Compensation (MVC) case (MVC 6/2024) heard on 25-09-2025. The court recorded the testimony of the first witness (claimant) who testified about a motor vehicle accident that occurred around 7:00 PM, where he was hit from behind by a pickup vehicle while delivering milk. He stated he received 12 days of inpatient treatment, suffered no permanent disability, and claimed daily wages of Rs. 700 as a casual laborer at age 53. Cross-examination of the witness was completed with no further examination required. The case appears to be proceeding through the evidence stage of the compensation claim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE,KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case