The State, Kundapura Rural P.S. Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Kundapura vs Ronald D.Souza @ Roni D.Souza — 508/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 417,376(2)(N),504,506. Status: SUMMONS. Next hearing: 18th March 2026.

SPL.C - SPECIAL CASES

CNR: KAUP300006972023

SUMMONS

Next Hearing

18th March 2026

e-Filing Number

16-08-2023

Filing Number

508/2023

Filing Date

11-08-2023

Registration No

508/2023

Registration Date

16-08-2023

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI, SITTING AT KUNDAPURA

Judge

992-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-SIT AT KUNDAPURA

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 417,376(2)(N),504,506
Scheduled Casts and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Attrocities) Act Section 3(1)(r)(s)(w-i),3(2)(v-a),3(2)(V)

Petitioner(s)

The State, Kundapura Rural P.S. Rep. by Public Prosecutor, Kundapura

Respondent(s)

Ronald D.Souza @ Roni D.Souza

Hearing History

Judge: 992-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-SIT AT KUNDAPURA

11-03-2026

SUMMONS

06-03-2026

SUMMONS

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE

06-02-2026

SUMMONS

07-01-2026

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

21-08-2023
Orders
14-07-2025
Charge
06-03-2026
Deposition

Summary The petition in Special Case No. 508/2023 from a Bengaluru court is dismissed. The court found that the complainant mother and her family were giving false testimony to support the accused (Ronnie D'Souza) in a case involving sexual abuse allegations against her daughter. The court rejected their claims of reconciliation and determined that their statements were unreliable, noting inconsistencies in their accounts and concluding they were attempting to shield the accused through perjured evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The petition in Special Case No. 508/2023 from a Bengaluru court is dismissed. The court found that the complainant mother and her family were giving false testimony to support the accused (Ronnie D'Souza) in a case involving sexual abuse allegations against her daughter. The court rejected their claims of reconciliation and determined that their statements were unreliable, noting inconsistencies in their accounts and concluding they were attempting to shield the accused through perjured evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI, SITTING AT KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case