Afroz Ahamad vs Mubeena — 629/2021

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: DEFENCE EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.

M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.

CNR: KAUP300005812021

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

15th April 2026

Filing Number

629/2021

Filing Date

14-09-2021

Registration No

629/2021

Registration Date

23-09-2021

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI, SITTING AT KUNDAPURA

Judge

992-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-SIT AT KUNDAPURA

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Afroz Ahamad

Adv. Bannadi Somanath Hegde

Respondent(s)

Mubeena

Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd., Udupi

Hearing History

Judge: 992-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-SIT AT KUNDAPURA

06-03-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

04-02-2026

DEFENCE EVIDENCE

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE

29-12-2025

ORDERS

11-12-2025

ORDERS

Interim Orders

29-07-2024
Issue
23-09-2024
Deposition
21-10-2024
Deposition
20-03-2025
Deposition
08-01-2026
Orders
08-01-2026
Orders
08-01-2026
Orders
08-01-2026
Orders

Summary: Anticipatory bail has been granted to the two petitioners (Geetha and Meenakshi) in Crime No.149/2025 registered at Kundapura Police Station for alleged offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other sections. The court found that prima facie no caste-based discrimination was evident, as the dispute arose from a civil matter regarding panchayath activities. The petitioners were ordered to execute a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 each with surety and must surrender before police within 30 days, subject to multiple conditions including cooperation with investigation and appearance before court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Anticipatory bail has been granted to the two petitioners (Geetha and Meenakshi) in Crime No.149/2025 registered at Kundapura Police Station for alleged offences under the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act and other sections. The court found that prima facie no caste-based discrimination was evident, as the dispute arose from a civil matter regarding panchayath activities. The petitioners were ordered to execute a personal bond of Rs.1,00,000 each with surety and must surrender before police within 30 days, subject to multiple conditions including cooperation with investigation and appearance before court as directed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI, SITTING AT KUNDAPURA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case