Anup D costa vs Santhosh Poojari — 424/2019
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: DEFENCE EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 22nd April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP300005222019
Next Hearing
22nd April 2026
Filing Number
424/2019
Filing Date
13-05-2019
Registration No
424/2019
Registration Date
03-06-2019
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI, SITTING AT KUNDAPURA
Judge
992-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-SIT AT KUNDAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anup D costa
Adv. K. Rajarama Shetty
Respondent(s)
Santhosh Poojari
Iffco-Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd., By its Div.Manager, Div.Office, Mangalore
Hearing History
Judge: 992-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-SIT AT KUNDAPURA
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
DEFENCE EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 17-02-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 13-01-2026 | DEFENCE EVIDENCE |
| 09-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 12-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Motor Vehicle Case No. 424-19, the court examined a motor vehicle accident case dated 05-11-2018. The court found that the second defendant's claim regarding the accident's cause lacked sufficient evidence and was not established. The court dismissed the application filed by the second defendant, holding that evidence of documents and witness statements did not support the defendant's version of events. The case involved detailed analysis of the accident circumstances, witness testimony, and documentary evidence before reaching this conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Motor Vehicle Case No. 424-19, the court examined a motor vehicle accident case dated 05-11-2018. The court found that the second defendant's claim regarding the accident's cause lacked sufficient evidence and was not established. The court dismissed the application filed by the second defendant, holding that evidence of documents and witness statements did not support the defendant's version of events. The case involved detailed analysis of the accident circumstances, witness testimony, and documentary evidence before reaching this conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts