Raju Marakala vs Rashmi S Shetty — 477/2022
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 166. Status: A.D.R. HEARING. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
M.V.C. - Accident Claim Cases u/r M.V.
CNR: KAUP300005032022
Next Hearing
01st April 2026
Filing Number
477/2022
Filing Date
08-06-2022
Registration No
477/2022
Registration Date
07-07-2022
Court
ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI, SITTING AT KUNDAPURA
Judge
992-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-SIT AT KUNDAPURA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Raju Marakala
Adv. Kothadi Uday Kumar Shetty
Respondent(s)
Rashmi S Shetty
The Universal Sompo General Insurance Co. Ltd.,Bangalore
Hearing History
Judge: 992-I ADDL.DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE-SIT AT KUNDAPURA
A.D.R. HEARING
A.D.R. HEARING
EVIDENCE
REFERRED TO LOK ADALATH
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | A.D.R. HEARING |
| 05-02-2026 | A.D.R. HEARING |
| 13-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-11-2025 | REFERRED TO LOK ADALATH |
| 13-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This document contains only the preamble and issues in a motor accident claims tribunal case (M.V.C.No.477/2022) before the MACT at Kundapura dated June 6, 2024, but does not include the actual judgment or order. The issues framed concern whether petitioner Raju Marakala sustained injuries due to rash/negligent driving by the Maruti Swift car driver, whether the driver lacked valid driving license, and what compensation is due. SKIP — The actual court order/outcome is not included in the provided document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document contains only the preamble and issues in a motor accident claims tribunal case (M.V.C.No.477/2022) before the MACT at Kundapura dated June 6, 2024, but does not include the actual judgment or order. The issues framed concern whether petitioner Raju Marakala sustained injuries due to rash/negligent driving by the Maruti Swift car driver, whether the driver lacked valid driving license, and what compensation is due. SKIP — The actual court order/outcome is not included in the provided document. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts