Ananda Naik vs Manjunath R.Naik — 575/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 06th March 2026.

Case disposedSub Stage

CRL.A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: KAUP300004112025

Filing Number

578/2025

Filing Date

24-Jul-2025

Registration No

575/2025

Registration Date

25-Jul-2025

Court

ADDL. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, UDUPI, SITTING AT KUNDAPURA

Judge

992-I Addl.district And Sessions Judge-Sit At Kundapura

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ananda Naik

    Adv. Udaya M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manjunath R.Naik

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution and non-representation. The appellant and their counsel failed to appear in court and did not comply with court orders despite being given sufficient opportunity, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge-Sit At Kundapura

  4. 06-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge-Sit At Kundapura

  5. 03-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge-Sit At Kundapura

  6. 04-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge-Sit At Kundapura

  7. 06-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge-Sit At Kundapura

  8. 03-Oct-2025

    Arguments

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge-Sit At Kundapura

  9. 03-Sep-2025

    Arguments

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge-Sit At Kundapura

  10. 11-Aug-2025

    Arguments

    I Addl.district And Sessions Judge-Sit At Kundapura

  11. 25-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 24-Jul-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 575/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution and non-representation. The appellant and their counsel failed to appear in court and did not comply with court orders despite being given sufficient opportunity, resulting in the dismissal of the appeal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case