SHO.KRPS vs A Ramya Shetty — 2118/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Status: ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: KAUP210029132023

ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

16th March 2026

e-Filing Number

10-11-2023

Filing Number

2118/2023

Filing Date

10-11-2023

Registration No

2118/2023

Registration Date

10-11-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA

Judge

513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A)
Motor Vehicles Act Section CMV,Rule,115,R/w,190(2)

Petitioner(s)

SHO.KRPS

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

A Ramya Shetty

Ramakrishna Shetty

Hearing History

Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL

28-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL

23-02-2026

ARGUMENTS-CRIMINAL

16-02-2026

ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC

09-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

28-08-2024
Deposition
13-02-2025
Deposition
10-03-2025
Deposition
10-03-2025
Deposition
02-04-2025
Deposition
02-04-2025
Deposition
13-05-2025
Deposition
21-08-2025
Deposition
21-08-2025
Deposition
26-09-2025
Deposition
16-02-2026
Deposition

Court Order Summary Criminal Case No. 2118/2023, Court of Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Karkala (dated 16-02-2026) The case involves cross-examination of witness PW-9 (T.D. Nagaraj), a 46-year-old Police Inspector. The court recorded the witness's deposition identifying documentary evidence, photographs, and vehicle-related documents. The defense counsel cross-examined the witness, raising questions about investigative procedures, lack of proper identification of accused persons, missing driving/pollution certificates, and procedural gaps in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Order Summary Criminal Case No. 2118/2023, Court of Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Karkala (dated 16-02-2026) The case involves cross-examination of witness PW-9 (T.D. Nagaraj), a 46-year-old Police Inspector. The court recorded the witness's deposition identifying documentary evidence, photographs, and vehicle-related documents. The defense counsel cross-examined the witness, raising questions about investigative procedures, lack of proper identification of accused persons, missing driving/pollution certificates, and procedural gaps in the investigation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case