Sudhakar G. Shetty vs Raju Shetty Advocate - SADANANDA SALIAN — 126/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Sec,26,Order,VII,Rules,1,to,6. Status: Hearing. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.

Hearing Next hearing 08-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP210023182025

Filing Number

127/2025

Filing Date

29-Oct-2025

Registration No

126/2025

Registration Date

31-Oct-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA

Judge

513-I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Sec,26,Order,VII,Rules,1,to,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sudhakar G. Shetty

    Adv. K. VIJENDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju Shetty Advocate - SADANANDA SALIAN

  2. 2.The Range Forest Officer, Karkala Range

  3. 3.The Tahashildar, Karkala Taluk,

  4. 4.The Deputy Conservator of Forest, Kundapura

  5. 5.The State of Karnataka, Represented by Deputy Commissioner, Udupi District

Case History

  1. 08-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 24-Jan-2026

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 19-Dec-2025

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 04-Nov-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's plea for an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing on or damaging the scheduled property. Instead, an emergent notice was issued on the interim application and suit summons were issued to the defendants, returnable by November 20, 2025, to allow the defendant to be heard before any injunction order is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 04-Nov-2025

    Summons

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 03-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 29-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 126/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's plea for an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing on or damaging the scheduled property. Instead, an emergent notice was issued on the interim application and suit summons were issued to the defendants, returnable by November 20, 2025, to allow the defendant to be heard before any injunction order is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case