Sudhakar G. Shetty vs Raju Shetty Advocate - SADANANDA SALIAN — 126/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Sec,26,Order,VII,Rules,1,to,6. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 08th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP210023182025
Next Hearing
08th April 2026
Filing Number
127/2025
Filing Date
29-10-2025
Registration No
126/2025
Registration Date
31-10-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA
Judge
513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sudhakar G. Shetty
Adv. K. VIJENDRA KUMAR
Respondent(s)
Raju Shetty Advocate - SADANANDA SALIAN
The Range Forest Officer, Karkala Range
The Tahashildar, Karkala Taluk,
The Deputy Conservator of Forest, Kundapura
The State of Karnataka, Represented by Deputy Commissioner, Udupi District
Hearing History
Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
HEARING
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | HEARING |
| 20-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 24-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 19-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 20-11-2025 | SUMMONS |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's plea for an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing on or damaging the scheduled property. Instead, an emergent notice was issued on the interim application and suit summons were issued to the defendants, returnable by November 20, 2025, to allow the defendant to be heard before any injunction order is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiff's plea for an ad-interim temporary injunction restraining the defendant from trespassing on or damaging the scheduled property. Instead, an emergent notice was issued on the interim application and suit summons were issued to the defendants, returnable by November 20, 2025, to allow the defendant to be heard before any injunction order is passed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts