Pushpalatha D. Shetty vs Babu Santhu Poojary Advocate - P. SUGANDH KUMAR — 104/2018

Case under Section Under,Sec,26,O,VII,R,1,to,9,of,CPC. Status: commission report. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.

commission report Next hearing 20-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP210020162018

Filing Number

106/2018

Filing Date

25-Sep-2018

Registration No

104/2018

Registration Date

25-Sep-2018

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA

Judge

513-I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Section Under,Sec,26,O,VII,R,1,to,9,of,CPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pushpalatha D. Shetty

    Adv. SUDESH SHETTY

  2. 2.Rakesh D. Shetty

  3. 3.Vivek D. Shetty

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Babu Santhu Poojary Advocate - P. SUGANDH KUMAR

  2. 2.Shailaja Shetty

  3. 3.Vijaya Shetty

  4. 4.Ramani Shetty

  5. 5.Reshma Shetty

  6. 6.Rekha Shetty

Case History

  1. 20-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  3. 06-Jan-2026

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  4. 24-Nov-2025

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  5. 28-Oct-2025

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  6. 20-Sep-2025

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  7. 20-Aug-2025

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  8. 31-Jul-2025

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  9. 07-Jul-2025

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  10. 06-Jun-2025

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  11. 25-Apr-2025

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  12. 18-Feb-2025

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  13. 30-Nov-2024

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  14. 22-Oct-2024

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  15. 24-Sep-2024

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  16. 28-Aug-2024

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  17. 03-Aug-2024

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  18. 02-Jul-2024

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  19. 31-May-2024

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  20. 04-Apr-2024

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  21. 19-Dec-2023

    commission report

    I Addl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC

  22. 30-Oct-2023

    commission report

  23. 23-Aug-2023

    commission report

  24. 21-Jun-2023

    commission report

  25. 05-Apr-2023

    commission report

  26. 14-Mar-2023

    commission report

  27. 15-Feb-2023

    commission report

  28. 20-Jan-2023

    commission report

  29. 12-Dec-2022

    commission report

  30. 19-Sep-2022

    commission report

  31. 07-Jul-2022

    commission report

  32. 22-Apr-2022

    commission report

  33. 28-Feb-2022

    commission report

  34. 10-Jan-2022

    commission report

  35. 18-Nov-2021

    commission report

  36. 21-Oct-2021

    commission report

  37. 19-Oct-2021

    commission report

  38. 31-Aug-2021

    commission report

  39. 16-Jul-2021

    commission report

  40. 27-May-2021

    commission report

  41. 01-Apr-2021

    commission report

  42. 17-Feb-2021

    commission report

  43. 08-Jan-2021

    commission report

  44. 02-Jan-2021

    OrdersView PDF

    Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC to conduct a local inspection and determine whether Defendant No.1 encroached upon a reserved road. The court found that a dispute exists regarding encroachment that cannot be resolved through oral evidence alone, making a commissioner's investigation necessary. The commissioner was appointed with a surveyor's assistance, fees fixed at Rs. 3,000 and Rs. 1,000 respectively, and directed to complete the work within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  45. 02-Jan-2021

    Summons

  46. 21-Dec-2020

    Orders -CIVIL

  47. 18-Dec-2020

    Hearing

  48. 04-Dec-2020

    Hearing

  49. 04-Nov-2020

    Hearing

  50. 07-Oct-2020

    Hearing

  51. 01-Oct-2020

    Objection

  52. 16-Sep-2020

    For clarification

  53. 02-Sep-2020

    Hearing

  54. 26-Aug-2020

    Hearing

  55. 17-Aug-2020

    Hearing

  56. 05-Aug-2020

    Hearing

  57. 27-Jul-2020

    Hearing

  58. 13-Jul-2020

    Hearing

  59. 10-Jul-2020

    Hearing

  60. 03-Jul-2020

    Hearing

  61. 25-Jun-2020

    Hearing

  62. 20-Jun-2020

    Hearing

  63. 17-Jun-2020

    Hearing

  64. 02-Jun-2020

    Hearing

  65. 12-May-2020

    Hearing

  66. 13-Apr-2020

    Hearing

  67. 04-Mar-2020

    Hearing

  68. 03-Feb-2020

    Hearing

  69. 11-Dec-2019

    Hearing

  70. 23-Oct-2019

    Hearing

  71. 16-Sep-2019

    Hearing

  72. 07-Aug-2019

    Hearing

  73. 11-Jul-2019

    Hearing

  74. 25-Jun-2019

    Hearing

  75. 29-May-2019

    Hearing

  76. 25-Apr-2019

    Hearing

  77. 23-Mar-2019

    Hearing

  78. 18-Feb-2019

    Objection

  79. 23-Jan-2019

    Objection

  80. 19-Dec-2018

    Summons

  81. 14-Nov-2018

    Summons

  82. 26-Oct-2018

    Notice

  83. 27-Sep-2018

    OrdersView PDF

  84. 27-Sep-2018

    Notice

  85. 26-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  86. 25-Sep-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 104/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC to conduct a local inspection and determine whether Defendant No.1 encroached upon a reserved road. The court found that a dispute exists regarding encroachment that cannot be resolved through oral evidence alone, making a commissioner's investigation necessary. The commissioner was appointed with a surveyor's assistance, fees fixed at Rs. 3,000 and Rs. 1,000 respectively, and directed to complete the work within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case