Pushpalatha D. Shetty vs Babu Santhu Poojary Advocate - P. SUGANDH KUMAR — 104/2018
Case under Section Under,Sec,26,O,VII,R,1,to,9,of,CPC. Status: commission report. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP210020162018
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
106/2018
Filing Date
25-09-2018
Registration No
104/2018
Registration Date
25-09-2018
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA
Judge
513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Pushpalatha D. Shetty
Adv. SUDESH SHETTY
Rakesh D. Shetty
Vivek D. Shetty
Respondent(s)
Babu Santhu Poojary Advocate - P. SUGANDH KUMAR
Shailaja Shetty
Vijaya Shetty
Ramani Shetty
Reshma Shetty
Rekha Shetty
Hearing History
Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
commission report
commission report
commission report
commission report
commission report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | commission report |
| 06-01-2026 | commission report |
| 24-11-2025 | commission report |
| 28-10-2025 | commission report |
| 20-09-2025 | commission report |
Interim Orders
Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC to conduct a local inspection and determine whether Defendant No.1 encroached upon a reserved road. The court found that a dispute exists regarding encroachment that cannot be resolved through oral evidence alone, making a commissioner's investigation necessary. The commissioner was appointed with a surveyor's assistance, fees fixed at Rs. 3,000 and Rs. 1,000 respectively, and directed to complete the work within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court allowed the plaintiffs' application to appoint an Advocate-Commissioner under Order XXVI Rule 9 of the CPC to conduct a local inspection and determine whether Defendant No.1 encroached upon a reserved road. The court found that a dispute exists regarding encroachment that cannot be resolved through oral evidence alone, making a commissioner's investigation necessary. The commissioner was appointed with a surveyor's assistance, fees fixed at Rs. 3,000 and Rs. 1,000 respectively, and directed to complete the work within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts