Ravindra Poojary vs Smt.Bhavani Poojarthi Advocate - K. SHUBHA — 184/2013
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Section,26,Order,VII,Rules,1,to6. Status: EVIDENCE-CIVIL. Next hearing: 02nd June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP210015962013
Next Hearing
02nd June 2026
Filing Number
183/2013
Filing Date
05-10-2013
Registration No
184/2013
Registration Date
08-10-2013
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA
Judge
513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ravindra Poojary
Adv. N. SAMPATH KUMAR SHETTY
Respondent(s)
Smt.Bhavani Poojarthi Advocate - K. SHUBHA
Smt. Monti Poojarthi
Smt. Kusuma Poojarthi
Smt. Korapolu Poojarthi
Adv. K. SHUBHA
Vasu Poojary
Sadhu Poojary
Smt. Puthu Poojarthi(Legal Heir)
Smt. Kamala Poojarthi
Sheena Poojary
Smt. Baby Poojarthi
Smt. Vanaja Poojarthi
Adv. H. SHEKHARA MADIVALA
Smt. Janaki Poojarthi
Adv. K. SRIRAMANA ACHAR
Ramesh Poojary
Shubha
Gopala Poojary
Smt. Vanaja Poojarthi
Vijaya Poojarthi
Vinuth
Vidya
Vikas
Smt. Baby Poojarthi
Smt. Hemalatha
Smt. Asha
Smt. Jyothi
Sathwik
Girish
Smt. Manjula
Kum. Kavitha
Vinay
Anil
Hearing History
Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
EVIDENCE-CIVIL
ARGUMENTS-CIVIL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 07-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 25-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CIVIL |
| 12-11-2025 | ARGUMENTS-CIVIL |
Interim Orders
Summary: Both I.A. No. XXXIX and XXXX filed by the plaintiff under Order 22 Rule 4 and Section 151 of CPC were allowed. The court permitted the impleading of legal heirs of deceased defendant No. 7 (Puthu Poojarthi) as supplemental defendants No. 7(a) to (g), and legal heirs of deceased supplemental defendant No. 7(a) (Thukri Poojarthi) as defendants No. 7(a)(i) to (iv) in the partition suit. The plaintiff's counsel was directed to amend the cause title accordingly by 07.08.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: Both I.A. No. XXXIX and XXXX filed by the plaintiff under Order 22 Rule 4 and Section 151 of CPC were allowed. The court permitted the impleading of legal heirs of deceased defendant No. 7 (Puthu Poojarthi) as supplemental defendants No. 7(a) to (g), and legal heirs of deceased supplemental defendant No. 7(a) (Thukri Poojarthi) as defendants No. 7(a)(i) to (iv) in the partition suit. The plaintiff's counsel was directed to amend the cause title accordingly by 07.08.2023. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts