SHO.KRPS vs Srikanth Kattimani — 536/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 16th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: KAUP210010452024

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

16th March 2026

e-Filing Number

10-06-2024

Filing Number

536/2024

Filing Date

10-06-2024

Registration No

536/2024

Registration Date

10-06-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA

Judge

513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 279,337

Petitioner(s)

SHO.KRPS

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Srikanth Kattimani

Hearing History

Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

24-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

05-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

19-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

06-12-2025

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

20-03-2025
Deposition
23-04-2025
Deposition
17-05-2025
Deposition
17-05-2025
Deposition
01-08-2025
Deposition
01-08-2025
Deposition
30-08-2025
Deposition
05-02-2026
Deposition
05-02-2026
Deposition
24-02-2026
Deposition
24-02-2026
Deposition
24-02-2026
Deposition
06-03-2026
Deposition

Summary In Criminal Case No. 536/2024 before the Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Karkala, the court recorded the deposition of witness Umesh Pujari on 06-03-2026. The witness testified regarding an incident on 21-12-2023 involving a KSRTC bus seizure under Sections 5 and 13 of the relevant act. The court allowed the defense to cross-examine the witness as a partially hostile witness, and the deposition was completed and authenticated by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Case No. 536/2024 before the Principal Civil Judge & JMFC, Karkala, the court recorded the deposition of witness Umesh Pujari on 06-03-2026. The witness testified regarding an incident on 21-12-2023 involving a KSRTC bus seizure under Sections 5 and 13 of the relevant act. The court allowed the defense to cross-examine the witness as a partially hostile witness, and the deposition was completed and authenticated by the judge. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case