SHO.KRPS vs Sriprasad Poojary — 500/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34,380,457. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KAUP210007742023
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
e-Filing Number
10-04-2023
Filing Number
500/2023
Filing Date
10-04-2023
Registration No
500/2023
Registration Date
10-04-2023
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA
Judge
513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO.KRPS
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Sriprasad Poojary
Sheeba Poojary
Hearing History
Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 27-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 26-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 14-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 955/2024 before the Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Karkala, the court recorded the deposition of ASI Shridhar U. (age 59, Hebri Police Station) on 26-02-2026 regarding a death inquest conducted on 28-01-2024. The accused's counsel challenged the witness testimony regarding statements allegedly recorded from outpatient witnesses (Cases 3-5), arguing they were not present during the inquest and the statements were fabricated at the police station. The court found the testimony credible and no cross-examination was conducted; the deposition was read, heard, and certified as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Criminal Case No. 955/2024 before the Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Karkala, the court recorded the deposition of ASI Shridhar U. (age 59, Hebri Police Station) on 26-02-2026 regarding a death inquest conducted on 28-01-2024. The accused's counsel challenged the witness testimony regarding statements allegedly recorded from outpatient witnesses (Cases 3-5), arguing they were not present during the inquest and the statements were fabricated at the police station. The court found the testimony credible and no cross-examination was conducted; the deposition was read, heard, and certified as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts