SHO.KRPS vs Sriprasad Poojary — 500/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 34,380,457. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: KAUP210007742023

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Next Hearing

04th June 2026

e-Filing Number

10-04-2023

Filing Number

500/2023

Filing Date

10-04-2023

Registration No

500/2023

Registration Date

10-04-2023

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA

Judge

513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 34,380,457

Petitioner(s)

SHO.KRPS

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

Sriprasad Poojary

Sheeba Poojary

Hearing History

Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

27-02-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

29-01-2026

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

26-12-2025

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

14-11-2025

EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL

Interim Orders

20-06-2024
Deposition
10-07-2024
Deposition
03-08-2024
Deposition
03-08-2024
Deposition
28-08-2024
Deposition
26-09-2024
Deposition
07-10-2024
Deposition
04-03-2025
Deposition
19-05-2025
Deposition
28-08-2025
Deposition
27-02-2026
Deposition
27-02-2026
Deposition
27-02-2026
Deposition

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 955/2024 before the Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Karkala, the court recorded the deposition of ASI Shridhar U. (age 59, Hebri Police Station) on 26-02-2026 regarding a death inquest conducted on 28-01-2024. The accused's counsel challenged the witness testimony regarding statements allegedly recorded from outpatient witnesses (Cases 3-5), arguing they were not present during the inquest and the statements were fabricated at the police station. The court found the testimony credible and no cross-examination was conducted; the deposition was read, heard, and certified as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 955/2024 before the Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Karkala, the court recorded the deposition of ASI Shridhar U. (age 59, Hebri Police Station) on 26-02-2026 regarding a death inquest conducted on 28-01-2024. The accused's counsel challenged the witness testimony regarding statements allegedly recorded from outpatient witnesses (Cases 3-5), arguing they were not present during the inquest and the statements were fabricated at the police station. The court found the testimony credible and no cross-examination was conducted; the deposition was read, heard, and certified as correct by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case