Mumtaz vs Karkala Town Municipality, Rept. by its Chief Officer, Karkala Town — 28/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Section,26,Order,VII,Rule,1,to,6. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUP210005632024

HEARING

Next Hearing

10th June 2026

Filing Number

28/2024

Filing Date

01-03-2024

Registration No

28/2024

Registration Date

01-03-2024

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA

Judge

513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Section,26,Order,VII,Rule,1,to,6

Petitioner(s)

Mumtaz

Adv. M. K. VIJAYA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

Karkala Town Municipality, Rept. by its Chief Officer, Karkala Town

Hearing History

Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

HEARING

26-02-2026

HEARING

11-02-2026

HEARING

06-01-2026

HEARING

26-11-2025

HEARING

Interim Orders

21-04-2025
Issue

The case (Original Suit No. 28/2024) before the Additional Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Karkala involves a dispute between Smt. Mumtaz and the Chief Officer of Karkala Town Municipality regarding alleged obstruction of a 15-foot approach road. The court has framed seven issues for determination, including whether the plaintiff proved the existence of the approach road, obstruction by the defendant with building materials, maintainability of the bare injunction suit, and entitlement to relief claimed. Issue No. 4 regarding illegal compound wall construction has been treated as a preliminary issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The case (Original Suit No. 28/2024) before the Additional Civil Judge & J.M.F.C., Karkala involves a dispute between Smt. Mumtaz and the Chief Officer of Karkala Town Municipality regarding alleged obstruction of a 15-foot approach road. The court has framed seven issues for determination, including whether the plaintiff proved the existence of the approach road, obstruction by the defendant with building materials, maintainability of the bare injunction suit, and entitlement to relief claimed. Issue No. 4 regarding illegal compound wall construction has been treated as a preliminary issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case