SEETHA SHERVEGAR vs RADHAKRISHNA — 39/2011

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Order,20,Rule,18,and,Section,54,and,151. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

FDP - FINAL DECREE PROCEEDINGS

CNR: KAUP210004972011

HEARING

Next Hearing

13th March 2026

Filing Date

22-11-2011

Registration No

39/2011

Registration Date

22-11-2011

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA

Judge

512-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Order,20,Rule,18,and,Section,54,and,151

Petitioner(s)

SEETHA SHERVEGAR

Adv. M. K. VIJAYA KUMAR, Vipul Tej M K

Respondent(s)

RADHAKRISHNA

BABY

Adv. K. SRIRAMANA ACHAR

NEELAVATHI

SAROJINI

UDAYA

VISHALAKSHI

SHALINI

REKHA

RAJESH

Hearing History

Judge: 512-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC

06-03-2026

HEARING

02-03-2026

OBJECTION

16-02-2026

OBJECTION

11-02-2026

OBJECTION

05-02-2026

HEARING

Interim Orders

18-06-2015
Deposition
18-02-2025
Deposition

Summary In FDP No. 39/2011 before the Civil Judge & JMFC, Karkala, a witness (Ratnaraj, 62 years old) was examined and sworn on 18.02.2025 regarding a property dispute. The court directed the plaintiff to conduct a fresh survey and measurement of the disputed property, and submit a detailed report and map since the court found discrepancies in the earlier survey documents (exhibits Nisi-1 and Nisi-2). The case was adjourned with orders for remeasurement and resubmission of documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In FDP No. 39/2011 before the Civil Judge & JMFC, Karkala, a witness (Ratnaraj, 62 years old) was examined and sworn on 18.02.2025 regarding a property dispute. The court directed the plaintiff to conduct a fresh survey and measurement of the disputed property, and submit a detailed report and map since the court found discrepancies in the earlier survey documents (exhibits Nisi-1 and Nisi-2). The case was adjourned with orders for remeasurement and resubmission of documentary evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case