Harishchandra Nayak vs Vasudeva Nayak Advocate - K. SHUBHA — 20/2021
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Under,Section,26,order,VII,Rule,1,to,2,and,section,151,of,CPC. Status: commission report. Next hearing: 20th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUP210004612021
Next Hearing
20th June 2026
Filing Number
20/2021
Filing Date
24-02-2021
Registration No
20/2021
Registration Date
24-02-2021
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA
Judge
513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Harishchandra Nayak
Adv. G. MURALIDHAR BHAT
Respondent(s)
Vasudeva Nayak Advocate - K. SHUBHA
Hearing History
Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
commission report
commission report
commission report
commission report
commission report
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | commission report |
| 12-01-2026 | commission report |
| 29-11-2025 | commission report |
| 09-10-2025 | commission report |
| 02-09-2025 | commission report |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's Interim Application No. III under Order 26 Rule 9 and Section 151 of CPC to appoint an Advocate-Court Commissioner for local inspection of the suit property to measure, identify, and report on the alleged encroachment by the defendant. The commissioner's fee was fixed at Rs. 3,000, and the defendant was permitted to file a work memo before the commissioner. The case is scheduled for call on 28-08-2023 for naming the advocate-commissioner and payment of fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's Interim Application No. III under Order 26 Rule 9 and Section 151 of CPC to appoint an Advocate-Court Commissioner for local inspection of the suit property to measure, identify, and report on the alleged encroachment by the defendant. The commissioner's fee was fixed at Rs. 3,000, and the defendant was permitted to file a work memo before the commissioner. The case is scheduled for call on 28-08-2023 for naming the advocate-commissioner and payment of fees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts