SHO.KRPS vs Saiyyad Jaleel Saheb — 247/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379. Status: EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: KAUP210003812022
Next Hearing
10th April 2026
e-Filing Number
14-02-2022
Filing Number
246/2022
Filing Date
14-02-2022
Registration No
247/2022
Registration Date
14-02-2022
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC , KARKALA
Judge
513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHO.KRPS
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Saiyyad Jaleel Saheb
Sayyed Afrid
Hearing History
Judge: 513-I ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 02-02-2026 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 06-12-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
| 07-11-2025 | EVIDENCE-CRIMINAL |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a deposition document from Criminal Case No. 247/2022 in the Court of Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Karkala, Karnataka. The witness (B. Ummar Saheb, 68 years old) testified on 07.11.2025 regarding an alleged assault incident on 22.02.2021 in Durga village, Karkala taluk. The witness stated he was unsure about the circumstances of his statement and claimed the police did not properly conduct an investigation, raising questions about the authenticity of his signature on certain documents. Cross-examination by the prosecution and defense counsel followed, and the case continues for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a deposition document from Criminal Case No. 247/2022 in the Court of Additional Civil Judge & JMFC, Karkala, Karnataka. The witness (B. Ummar Saheb, 68 years old) testified on 07.11.2025 regarding an alleged assault incident on 22.02.2021 in Durga village, Karkala taluk. The witness stated he was unsure about the circumstances of his statement and claimed the police did not properly conduct an investigation, raising questions about the authenticity of his signature on certain documents. Cross-examination by the prosecution and defense counsel followed, and the case continues for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts