Mohammed Afham vs Mohammed Asham Saheb — 1120/2024
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section U/s166. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 19th May 2026.
M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR VEHICLES ACT
CNR: KAUP200011752024
Next Hearing
19th May 2026
Filing Number
1120/2024
Filing Date
02-12-2024
Registration No
1120/2024
Registration Date
09-12-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA
Judge
801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Mohammed Afham
Adv. NAGESH V. PAI
Respondent(s)
Mohammed Asham Saheb
The Branch Manager, IFFCO TOKIO General Ins.Co.Ltd.,Mangalore
The Divisional Manager, The New India Ass.Co.Ltd.,Udupi
Hearing History
Judge: 801-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
SUMMONS
A.D.R.
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
| 21-11-2025 | A.D.R. |
Interim Orders
Summary: In Motor Vehicle Case No. 1120 of 2024, the Senior Civil Judge, Karkala framed four issues on 22 May 2025 regarding a road traffic accident claim filed by Mohammed Afham against Mohammed Asham Saheb and others. The case involves determining liability for injuries sustained in the accident of 04-06-2024, whether the driver held a valid driving licence, and the entitlement to and quantum of compensation. The case has been set for adjudication on these framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In Motor Vehicle Case No. 1120 of 2024, the Senior Civil Judge, Karkala framed four issues on 22 May 2025 regarding a road traffic accident claim filed by Mohammed Afham against Mohammed Asham Saheb and others. The case involves determining liability for injuries sustained in the accident of 04-06-2024, whether the driver held a valid driving licence, and the entitlement to and quantum of compensation. The case has been set for adjudication on these framed issues. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts