The Stete of Karnataka, Rep by PSI Ajekar P.S. vs RATHNAKARA AMIN — 499/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/Sec 353(2). Status: Appearance Of Accussed. Next hearing: 13th March 2026.

Appearance Of Accussed Next hearing 13-Mar-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUP200009482025

e-Filing Number

21-11-2025

Filing Number

499/2025

Filing Date

19-Nov-2025

Registration No

499/2025

Registration Date

21-Nov-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND ACJM, KARKALA

Judge

801-Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

Last updated 12-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section U/Sec 353(2)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Stete of Karnataka, Rep by PSI Ajekar P.S.

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RATHNAKARA AMIN

Case History

  1. 13-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  3. 30-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  4. 14-Jan-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    SUMMARY The Senior Civil Judge rejected the prosecution's application to cancel the bail of accused Rathnakara Amin under Section 480(5) of BNSS. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient cogent evidence of alleged bail condition violations and that only bare allegations were made without proof of the accused committing similar offences. The bail remains valid as the accused is regularly appearing before court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 14-Jan-2026

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  6. 09-Jan-2026

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  7. 12-Dec-2025

    Orders

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  8. 05-Dec-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    Senior CIVIL Judge And Acjm

  9. 21-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 499/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Senior Civil Judge rejected the prosecution's application to cancel the bail of accused Rathnakara Amin under Section 480(5) of BNSS. The court found that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient cogent evidence of alleged bail condition violations and that only bare allegations were made without proof of the accused committing similar offences. The bail remains valid as the accused is regularly appearing before court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case